- Transparent flat fees · Attorneys with 25+ years of combined trademark experience
A suggestive mark hints at what you sell without saying it outright, like COPPERTONE for sunscreen. It is registrable and still easy to market. A Minnesota trademark attorney at Twin Cities Trademarks helps you land on the right side of the line between suggestive and descriptive.
Flat, published fees · Offices in St. Paul & Coon Rapids · 100% recommend on Facebook (100+ reviews)
Short answer: A suggestive trademark hints at a quality of the product or service but requires a mental leap to connect the two. COPPERTONE suggests a tan; GREYHOUND suggests speed. Suggestive marks are inherently distinctive, so they register on the USPTO Principal Register without proof of consumer recognition. The main risk is that an examiner sees the mark as merely descriptive instead. A Minnesota trademark lawyer can help you choose a name, and argue for it, so it lands on the suggestive side.
| Service | What's included | Fee |
|---|---|---|
| Federal trademark application (one class) | $700 legal fee + $350 USPTO filing fee | $1,050 |
| Each additional class | $150 legal fee + $350 USPTO filing fee | $500 |
| Office action response | Quoted before work begins | Typically $350–$900 |
| Statement of use (intent-to-use) | Per class, government fee included | $550 per class |
| Six-month extension of time to show use | Per class, government fee included | $550 per class |
| Formal screening search | Preliminary screening of your proposed mark | $600 |
| Comprehensive search | USPTO records plus state trademark registries | $1,600 |
Flat fees as published on our fee schedule. USPTO fees are set by the government and can change. Paying a filing fee does not guarantee registration.
A suggestive mark connects to the product through imagery, metaphor or implication rather than direct description. Courts describe the test this way: if a consumer needs imagination, thought or perception to figure out what the goods are, the mark is suggestive. If the mark immediately tells them, it is descriptive.
Well-known examples include COPPERTONE for sunscreen, GREYHOUND for bus service and CHICKEN OF THE SEA for canned tuna. Each one points toward a benefit or characteristic, but none simply names it.
Hypothetical spectrum for a Minnesota ice-fishing shelter:
Ice House is generic (it is what Minnesotans call the product). Insulated Ice Shelter is descriptive. Frost Haven is suggestive: it evokes warmth and refuge without naming the product. Cardinal would be arbitrary, and an invented word like Zevrik would be fanciful.
Suggestive marks are the lowest tier of inherently distinctive marks. Below them, descriptive terms need proof of acquired distinctiveness, and generic terms can never be registered.
| Category | What it is | USPTO treatment | Scope of protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanciful | Invented word with no prior meaning | Registers if no conflict; no distinctiveness proof needed | Broadest |
| Arbitrary | Real word unrelated to the goods or services | Registers if no conflict; no distinctiveness proof needed | Broad |
| Suggestive | Hints at a quality; takes imagination to connect | Registers on the Principal Register without proof | Moderate to strong |
| Descriptive | Directly describes a feature, quality, purpose or place | Refused under §2(e)(1) unless acquired distinctiveness is shown; Supplemental Register is an option | Narrow until secondary meaning is proven |
| Generic | The common name for the product or service | Always refused; no amount of use cures it | None |
The boundary between suggestive and descriptive is the most argued question in trademark examination. Examining attorneys and courts commonly look at:
Under USPTO practice, genuine doubt about whether a mark is merely descriptive is resolved in the applicant's favor. That is why a well-supported argument from an experienced Minnesota trademark attorney matters.
The tradeoff is scope. Suggestive marks are protectable but generally narrower than fanciful or arbitrary marks, because others may use related imagery for similar goods.
If the USPTO issues a Section 2(e)(1) office action claiming your suggestive mark is merely descriptive, you typically have three months to respond, with one three-month extension available for a fee. Your MN trademark lawyer can:
Learn more about the process in our guide to trademark office actions.
Suggestive names are among the most common choices for Minnesota small businesses: HVAC and home-service companies, restaurants and food trucks, wellness studios, outdoor-gear makers, craft breweries and Twin Cities software startups all want a name that hints at what they offer. That is also why these businesses see a lot of descriptiveness refusals.
A Minnesota trademark lawyer at Twin Cities Trademarks works with clients in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Coon Rapids, Blaine, Woodbury, Maple Grove, White Bear Lake, Rochester, St. Cloud and across the state. We meet by phone, video or in person in St. Paul or Coon Rapids, and a MN trademark lawyer on our team handles filings for Minnesota businesses that sell nationwide.
Transparent, flat-fee pricing. Federal applications start at $700 plus the $350 USPTO fee per class. Your Twin Cities trademark lawyer quotes every other service up front, before work begins.
A suggestive trademark hints at a quality or characteristic of a product or service but requires imagination to connect the two, such as COPPERTONE for sunscreen. It is inherently distinctive and registrable without proof of secondary meaning.
Examples include COPPERTONE for sunscreen, GREYHOUND for bus service and CHICKEN OF THE SEA for tuna. Each suggests something about the product without directly describing it.
A descriptive mark immediately tells consumers about a feature or purpose of the goods. A suggestive mark requires imagination or a mental leap. Suggestive marks register without proof of distinctiveness; descriptive marks do not.
The imagination test asks whether a consumer needs imagination, thought or perception to understand what the goods are from the mark. If so, the mark is likely suggestive rather than descriptive.
Yes. Suggestive marks are inherently distinctive and can be registered on the USPTO Principal Register without evidence of secondary meaning.
Examiners often treat marks that hint at a product as merely descriptive. A Minnesota trademark attorney can respond with arguments and evidence showing the mark requires imagination.
You can argue the mark is suggestive, submit evidence, amend the goods or services, claim acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f), or amend to the Supplemental Register. The response is generally due within three months.
It is protectable without extra proof, but usually narrower in scope than arbitrary or fanciful marks, because related imagery may be used by others for similar goods.
Yes. Slogans are judged on the same spectrum. A slogan that merely describes the product or praises it is not registrable without acquired distinctiveness, but a creative, suggestive slogan can be.
Often yes. A double entendre with a non-descriptive second meaning can make a mark suggestive, as long as consumers would perceive both meanings in context.
Yes. Examiners review your website and packaging. If you use the mark as a description of the product, it can support a descriptiveness refusal.
Usually not. Two descriptive words combined are typically still descriptive, unless the combination creates a new, incongruous meaning.
Most applications take about a year or more, longer if an office action must be answered.
At Twin Cities Trademarks, federal applications start at a $700 flat fee plus the $350 USPTO fee per class. Office action responses are quoted before work begins.
The USPTO examining attorney decides at first, and refusals can be appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In litigation, courts decide.
A suggestive name balances marketing appeal and legal strength, which is why many startups choose one. A Minnesota trademark lawyer can test your favorite names before you commit.
It can if the industry starts using the term to describe products. Consistent brand use and enforcement help keep it suggestive.
A Minnesota state registration only covers Minnesota. Federal registration gives nationwide rights and stronger enforcement tools.
It is not required, but a MN trademark lawyer can frame the goods and services carefully and argue against a descriptiveness refusal, which is where most suggestive marks run into trouble.
We review your name, run a clearance search, file at a flat fee and respond to office actions. Call (651) 222-3776 for a free consultation.
Free consultation by phone, video or in person in St. Paul or Coon Rapids.
Twin Cities Trademarks PLLC · St. Paul & Coon Rapids, MN. This page provides general information, not legal advice for your situation. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Fees listed exclude USPTO government fees unless stated and may change; see our pricing page for current figures.
