- Transparent flat fees · Attorneys with 25+ years of combined trademark experience
A fanciful mark is a word you invent, like KODAK or EXXON, and it is the strongest kind of trademark the law recognizes. A Minnesota trademark attorney at Twin Cities Trademarks helps you create, clear and federally register a coined name so it stays yours.
Flat, published fees · Offices in St. Paul & Coon Rapids · 100% recommend on Facebook (100+ reviews)
Short answer: A fanciful trademark is a made-up word with no meaning other than identifying your brand. Because it describes nothing, the USPTO treats it as inherently distinctive: it can register without proof of consumer recognition, and it gets the broadest protection against copycats. The tradeoffs are a heavier marketing lift and a real risk of the name becoming generic if it is misused. A Minnesota trademark lawyer can clear sound-alike conflicts before you invest in the name.
| Service | What's included | Fee |
|---|---|---|
| Federal trademark application (one class) | $700 legal fee + $350 USPTO filing fee | $1,050 |
| Each additional class | $150 legal fee + $350 USPTO filing fee | $500 |
| Office action response | Quoted before work begins | Typically $350–$900 |
| Statement of use (intent-to-use) | Per class, government fee included | $550 per class |
| Six-month extension of time to show use | Per class, government fee included | $550 per class |
| Formal screening search | Preliminary screening of your proposed mark | $600 |
| Comprehensive search | USPTO records plus state trademark registries | $1,600 |
Flat fees as published on our fee schedule. USPTO fees are set by the government and can change. Paying a filing fee does not guarantee registration.
A fanciful mark is a coined term invented for the sole purpose of serving as a brand. Classic examples are KODAK for cameras, EXXON for fuel and XEROX for copiers. None of those words existed before the companies created them, so they carry no descriptive meaning a competitor would ever need to use.
Courts place every proposed mark on a spectrum of distinctiveness first laid out in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World (2d Cir. 1976): fanciful, arbitrary, suggestive, descriptive and generic. Fanciful marks sit at the top. The U.S. Supreme Court confirmed in Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana (1992) that inherently distinctive marks are protectable without proof of secondary meaning, which is exactly what makes coined names so valuable.
A fanciful mark can be a single invented word (a hypothetical Vorlina for skincare), a blend of word fragments that forms a new term, or a deliberately unfamiliar spelling that no longer reads as a real word. Clever misspellings of descriptive words, however, usually do not count. Kwik Kleen is still read as "quick clean," which is descriptive.
This comparison shows how the USPTO and courts treat each category. The stronger the category, the easier the mark is to register and the wider the zone of protection around it.
| Category | What it is | USPTO treatment | Scope of protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanciful | Invented word with no prior meaning | Registers if no conflict; no distinctiveness proof needed | Broadest |
| Arbitrary | Real word unrelated to the goods or services | Registers if no conflict; no distinctiveness proof needed | Broad |
| Suggestive | Hints at a quality; takes imagination to connect | Registers on the Principal Register without proof | Moderate to strong |
| Descriptive | Directly describes a feature, quality, purpose or place | Refused under §2(e)(1) unless acquired distinctiveness is shown; Supplemental Register is an option | Narrow until secondary meaning is proven |
| Generic | The common name for the product or service | Always refused; no amount of use cures it | None |
Strong protection comes with practical costs. A good Minnesota trademark attorney will walk you through them before you commit, and an experienced MN trademark lawyer will tell you plainly when a name is not worth the fight.
The biggest mistake we see is assuming a made-up word must be free to use. Likelihood of confusion turns on sight, sound and meaning, so our clearance work looks well beyond exact matches:
As your MN trademark lawyer, we then give you a written risk opinion and recommend the right filing basis. If you have not launched yet, an intent-to-use application locks in a nationwide priority date while you finish the product.
Registration is only the start. To keep a coined name strong for decades, follow a few rules and build them into your brand guidelines:
Our brand monitoring and enforcement service watches the USPTO and the marketplace so you can address problems before they spread.
Fanciful marks are a natural fit for many of the businesses we represent across Minnesota. Medical device and health-tech startups in the Twin Cities often use coined names because their products are new and need a brand that will travel nationally and abroad. Software and SaaS companies in Minneapolis and St. Paul use invented names to secure matching domains. Consumer-product, beverage and outdoor-gear brands rely on coined names to stand out on retail shelves and online marketplaces.
Whether you are in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Coon Rapids, Rochester, Duluth or St. Cloud, a Minnesota trademark lawyer from our firm can meet by phone, video or in person at our St. Paul or Coon Rapids offices. Federal trademark law is national, so your MN trademark lawyer can protect the name in all 50 states for Minnesota founders who sell across the country.
Transparent, flat-fee pricing. Federal applications start at $700 plus the $350 USPTO fee per class. Your Twin Cities trademark lawyer quotes every other service up front, before work begins.
A fanciful trademark is an invented word that has no meaning other than identifying a brand, such as KODAK or EXXON. It is the strongest category of trademark because it is inherently distinctive.
Because a coined word describes nothing, consumers connect it only with one source. That makes it registrable without proof of secondary meaning and gives it a broad scope of protection against similar marks on related goods.
Well-known examples include KODAK for cameras, EXXON for petroleum products and XEROX for copiers. Each was a new word created to serve as a brand.
A fanciful mark is an invented word. An arbitrary mark is a real word used for unrelated goods, such as APPLE for computers. Both are inherently distinctive, but fanciful marks usually face fewer conflicts.
Usually not. If consumers still read the misspelling as the original word, the USPTO treats it as that word. A misspelled descriptive term, like Kwik Kleen for cleaning services, is still descriptive.
Yes. A coined word avoids descriptiveness refusals, but it can still be refused for likelihood of confusion with a similar-sounding registered mark, or for specimen and identification problems. A clearance search reduces that risk.
Yes. Confusion is judged on sight, sound and meaning, so a different spelling of a similar-sounding word can block you. A Minnesota trademark attorney searches phonetic equivalents, not just exact matches.
Most applications take roughly a year or more from filing to registration, depending on USPTO backlogs, office actions and whether you file on an intent-to-use basis.
At Twin Cities Trademarks, federal applications start at a $700 flat fee plus the $350 USPTO fee per class. Clearance searches and other services are quoted up front.
Yes. An intent-to-use application reserves a nationwide priority date before you start selling. You later file a statement of use once the mark is in commerce, with extensions available if launch takes longer.
Yes. Aspirin, thermos and escalator were once brand names that became generic through public misuse. Using the mark as an adjective with a generic noun and policing misuse helps prevent genericide.
Use it consistently as a brand, mark it with ™ or ®, never use it as a verb or noun, include usage rules in licenses, and monitor the market for misuse and infringing filings.
It can. Under the doctrine of foreign equivalents, the USPTO may translate words from common foreign languages. If your coined word means something descriptive in another language, it may be treated as descriptive.
From a legal standpoint, a fanciful or arbitrary name is far stronger. A descriptive name is easier to market at first but harder to register and protect. Many startups pair a coined mark with a descriptive tagline.
It is not legally required, but a Minnesota trademark lawyer can catch sound-alike conflicts, choose the right classes and filing basis, and respond to office actions, which avoids costly refiling.
A Minnesota state registration under Minn. Stat. chapter 333 covers only Minnesota. A federal registration gives nationwide rights and the ® symbol, which matters for brands selling online or across state lines.
Yes. Coined names work well for online sellers, and a pending or registered federal trademark is required to enroll in Amazon Brand Registry.
A standard-character registration protects the word itself in any font or design. If your logo has distinctive design elements, a separate special-form registration can protect the design.
A MN trademark lawyer will assess priority dates, how similar the marks and goods are, and the options, which can include a coexistence agreement, a cease-and-desist letter, an opposition or a rebrand.
We help you vet a coined name, run a full clearance search, file a federal application at a flat fee, answer office actions and monitor your mark after registration. Call (651) 222-3776 for a free consultation.
Free consultation by phone, video or in person in St. Paul or Coon Rapids.
Twin Cities Trademarks PLLC · St. Paul & Coon Rapids, MN. This page provides general information, not legal advice for your situation. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Fees listed exclude USPTO government fees unless stated and may change; see our pricing page for current figures.
